f. The agreement must take into account the fact that the court is ruling on a dispute already made at the time of the submission of a reference to the Tribunal. In Hiscox Dedicated Corporate Member v. Weyerhaeuser Co  EWHC 2671 (Comm), the High Court sued the defendant (Weyerhaeuser) because it was very likely that the parties had agreed to submit their case to the London arbitration. In the pioneering case of K.K. Modi v. K.N. Modi and Ors. (1998) 3 CSC 573, it was decided by the Supreme Court of Hon`ble that the following attributes must be included in an arbitration agreement: the intention of the parties is of the utmost importance. No form has been imposed for an arbitration agreement and nowhere has it been mentioned that terms such as arbitration, the arbitrator are essential conditions in an arbitration agreement. According to the prevailing case law, the parties` intention to refer their dispute to arbitration should be clearly established in the arbitration agreement.
Agreements to refer disputes to arbitration generally have a special status in the eyes of the law. Like what. B in the case of contractual disputes, there is a common defence that argues that the contract is inconclusive and, therefore, not everyone is entitled to it. It follows that if a party successfully asserts that a contract is void, then any clause in the contract, including the compromise clause, would be null and void. However, in most countries, the courts have accepted this: in accordance with the informality of the arbitration procedure, the law is generally interested in obtaining the validity of arbitration clauses, even if they do not have the normal language of form linked to legal contracts. Among the clauses that have been confirmed are the Korean Arbitration Act is the most important arbitration right in the Republic of Korea. The official body that settles disputes through arbitration is the Korean Commercial Arbitration Board. Korean lawyers and companies increasingly prefer arbitration to litigation.  The number of arbitrations in Korea is increasing year on year.  The “future” disputes that may arise if the agreement is stipulated in the material agreement between the parties, i.e. in an arbitration clause, or the growth of arbitration, means that there is a fundamental change in the way we legislate.
Another important thing is to decide things in a much shorter time frame and the different or separate clauses mentioned in the commercial contract. They pave the way for the most effective and appropriate means, without having to go through courtrooms. Arbitration is generally the most effective form of dispute resolution between the parties, which do not require lengthy Court of Justice proceedings to rule. It is profitable, it saves time, it also allows you to choose your own referees. As a result, decisions are made quickly and, more often than not, satisfactorily, depending on the nature of the case. The disassociability, dissociatability and principle of autonomy of the arbitration agreement prevent the validity of one agreement from being overlapped with the other.